Avi Viera interview

itfc1959 wrote:Seems like a nice girl.

*I-Am-No-Expert-ALERT*

The rule of thumb, as ever, has to be caveat emptor. It doesn't matter if they're butt-ugly: if what they are offering looks to be too good to be true, then it probably is. It doesn't matter if it's Invicta, Renato or SO: people have wised up and even they must know that if they're going to try to pull a fast one then they will be found out, sure as night follows day.

Well said, and I hope you are right about all of that, especially that last bit...

That blog bugs me. Cripes; the guy can't read, write, punctuate, or spell. Wait - that's the perfect type of person to be blogging about TV watches, what am I saying.

As for Avi, honestly, she seems like an okay sort; I kind of feel sorry for her, in a way, because repping TV watches is obviously a tightrope of sleight-of-hand; say certain things, hide others, and when called out on your claims, hide. That's what the Skeltons, Davises, Temples, and their ilk have always done, and when you're bringing on a $400 watch that's worth $130 in real money and trumpeting it as an heirloom, there's gonna be more than a little BS in there to try to push TV watchers to reach for their credit cards. It's a sorry job with a short shelf life, but she seems the type to bounce into another field without too much trouble - but seeing a seemingly nice person jump into a shark tank to make a living is troubling. But that's home shopping; porn stars have more integrity than home shopping hosts.